Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2003;79:581-584; doi:10.1136/pmj.79.936.581
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine.
Postgraduate Medical Journal 2003;79:581-584
© 2003 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Performance of clinical referral criteria for bone densitometry in patients under 65 years of age assessed by spine bone mineral density

K Kayan, D de Takats, R Ashford, J A Kanis, E V McCloskey

WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr E V McCloskey
WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK; e.v.mccloskey{at}shef.ac.uk

Background: A case finding strategy based on a number of established risk factors has been suggested by Royal College of Physicians’ (RCP) guidelines to optimise bone densitometry referrals for assessment of osteoporosis.

Objective: The performance of clinical referral criteria was examined in women and men aged <65 years referred for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment.

Study design: Cross sectional observational study over six months.

Results: Though BMD tended to be lower in patients with multiple criteria for referral, differences from those referred with a single criterion were not statistically significant. The overall prevalence of osteoporosis was higher than expected in both sexes, 11.6% in women and 27.5% in men (expected prevalences were 8% and <1% respectively). BMD was significantly lower in patients referred with a single criterion compatible with the RCP guidelines than in age matched controls or in those patients referred with non-RCP criteria (mean (SD) Z score –0.47(1.38) v 0.35(1.41), p<0.001). Low body mass index was also significantly associated with a lower than expected BMD. In contrast, spine BMD was higher than expected in those with self reported back pain, loss of height, or spinal curvature (p = NS).

Conclusion: Most of the criteria recommended by the RCP performed well in identifying relatively younger patients with low BMD and osteoporosis. However, prior fractures and corticosteroid use did not reach statistical significance probably due to inclusion of all energy fractures, and current or past steroid use of unspecified dose or duration. Criteria like loss of height and/or spine curvature perform relatively poorly, reflecting the need for further investigation to better identify those needing BMD assessment.

Keywords: bone density; osteoporosis; densitometry; spine bone mineral density

Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; RCP, Royal College of Physicians


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.