ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Misinterpretation of the chest x ray as a factor in the delayed diagnosis of lung cancer

P M Turkington¹, N Kennan² and M A Greenstone¹

¹ Department of Respiratory Medicine, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, East Yorkshire, UK
² Department of Radiology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, East Yorkshire, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M A Greenstone, Medical Chest Unit, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, East Yorkshire HU16 5JQ, UK;
sternes{at}sternes.demon.co.uk

All patients in 1997 with a histologically proved diagnosis of lung cancer in Castle Hill Hospital in whom a full set of case notes and x rays could be retrieved were studied. All previous chest x rays were reviewed by a consultant chest physician and a radiologist, who were blinded to the eventual site of the lesion and the point at which a suspicious abnormality first appeared. Case notes were inspected to clarify the cause of any error. Fifty eight patients were eligible, 28 of whom had previous chest x rays. Of these 14 were found to be abnormal. A significant difference (p=0.007) in time from diagnosis to death was found between those with a missed abnormality, median (interquartile range, IQR) 105 (55–219) days and those with no previous abnormality, median (IQR) 260 (137–512) days. In the 14 in whom the diagnosis was missed the median (IQR) delay from first abnormal chest x ray to the eventual diagnostic x ray was 101 (48–339) days. A significant difference (p=0.001) was also found between the median (IQR) time from first abnormal chest x ray to start of treatment between those with missed abnormalities, 155 (115–376) days, and those with no previous abnormality on chest x ray, 51 (44–77) days. The most common reason (47%) for the diagnosis to be missed was failure of the radiologist reporting the x ray to recognise the abnormality.

It is not unusual to find previous significant radiological abnormalities in patients in whom a diagnosis of lung cancer is later made. This leads to a diagnostic delay which has a significant effect on time to initiation of treatment and palliation of symptoms, although not necessarily to eventual outcome.

Keywords: lung cancer; diagnosis; chest radiograph; radiologist

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• White, C. S., Flukinger, T., Jeudy, J., Chen, J. J. (2009). Use of a Computer-aided Detection System to Detect Missed Lung Cancer at Chest Radiography. Radiology 252: 273-281 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bain, G., Sawicka, E., Tyler, P. (2009). Chest x rays--who should report them acutely?. Postgrad. Med. J. 85: 337-338 [Full Text]  
• Singh, H., Sethi, S., Raber, M., Petersen, L. A. (2007). Errors in Cancer Diagnosis: Current Understanding and Future Directions. JCO 25: 5009-5018 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2005). Spoken sessions. Thorax 60: ii4-ii52 [Full Text]  
• Manning, D J, Ethell, S C, Donovan, T (2004). Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph. Br. J. Radiol. 77: 231-235 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shah, P. K., Austin, J. H. M., White, C. S., Patel, P., Haramati, L. B., Pearson, G. D. N., Shiau, M. C., Berkmen, Y. M. (2003). Missed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Radiographic Findings of Potentially Resectable Lesions Evident Only in Retrospect. Radiology 226: 235-241 [Abstract] [Full Text]