AUDIT

An audit of activity and outcome from a daily and a weekly "one stop" rapid assessment chest pain clinic

J Byrne¹, D Murdoch¹, C Morrison², J McMurray³

¹ Department of Cardiology, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK
² Greater Glasgow Health Board, Glasgow, UK
³ Department of Cardiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr John Byrne, Department of Cardiology, Southern General Hospital, Govan Road, Glasgow G53 4TF, UK;
John.Byrne{at}sgh.scot.nhs.uk

Objectives: The recent National Service Framework for coronary heart disease advocates the establishment of rapid assessment clinics for chest pain. But how should these clinics be organised and do they fulfil their objectives? The aim of this study was to compare referral patterns to a daily and a weekly "one stop" rapid access chest pain clinic (RACPC), and to examine clinical outcome in patients attending these clinics.

Design: Patients were prospectively categorised into one of the following subgroups: "acute coronary syndrome", "stable coronary heart disease", or "low risk/non-coronary chest pain". Fatal and non-fatal outcomes were audited over eight months.

Setting: Both RACPCs were situated within the cardiology departments of two large Glasgow teaching hospitals. Patients were seen by a cardiologist, and underwent non-invasive testing.

Participants: A total of 633 patients with chest pain who were referred by their general practitioner; 500 came to the daily and 133 to the weekly clinic. Forty four (7%) were categorised as having an acute coronary syndrome, 267 (42%) as stable coronary artery disease, and 322 (51%) as low risk/non-coronary chest pain.

Results: Referral patterns to the two clinics differed significantly. Compared with the weekly clinic, more patients with an acute coronary syndrome (7.8 v 3.8%) and low risk/non-coronary chest pain (55.2 v 35.6%), but fewer patients with stable coronary disease (37.0 v 61.6%) were referred to the daily clinic (p<0.00001).

During follow up eight (1.3%) patients died from a cardiac cause, and eight (1.3%) patients suffered a myocardial infarction. None of these patients were classified as low risk/non-coronary chest pain.

Conclusions: (1) RACPCs do provide an effective tool for the early assessment of patients with possible angina. (2) The frequency with which clinics are scheduled may be an important factor in determining how the service is utilised in practice.

Keywords: chest pain; exercise electrocardiography; angina pectoris; rapid assessment chest pain clinic

Abbreviations: NSF, National Service Framework; RACPCs, rapid access chest pain clinics

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Taylor, G L, Murphy, N F, Berry, C, Christie, J, Finlayson, A, MacIntyre, K, Morrison, C, McMurray, J (2008). Long-term outcome of low-risk patients attending a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic. Heart 94: 628-632 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Connolly, S.B., Collier, T., Khugputh, R., Tataree, D., Kyereme, K., Merritt, S., Struthers, A.D., Fox, K.F. (2007). Brain natriuretic peptide testing for angina in a rapid-access chest pain clinic. QJM 100: 779-783 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sekhri, N, Feder, G S, Junghans, C, Hemingway, H, Timmis, A D (2007). How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? Prognosis of incident angina and non-cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients. Heart 93: 458-463 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Dumville, J., MacPherson, H, Griffith, K, Miles, J., Lewin, R. (2007). Non-cardiac chest pain: a retrospective cohort study of patients who attended a Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic. Fam Pract 24: 152-157 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tenkorang, J N, Fox, K F, Collier, T J, Wood, D A (2006). A rapid access cardiology service for chest pain, heart failure and arrhythmias accurately diagnoses cardiac disease and identifies patients at high risk: a prospective cohort study. Heart 92: 1084-1090 [Abstract] [Full Text]