Audit
Management of spontaneous pneumothorax
a Welsh survey
J H Yeoh, S Ansari, I A Campbell
Department of
Chest Medicine, Llandough Hospital, Penlan Road, Penarth, Vale of
Glamorgan CF64 2XX, UK
Correspondence to: Dr Campbell
Submitted 6 October
1999;
Accepted 16 December 1999
The authors sought to determine to what degree current practice
by hospital physicians and accident and emergency (A&E) departments in
Wales conformed to the British Thoracic Society's guidelines for the
management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Questionnaires were posted
to all consultants involved in emergency medical admissions in Wales
(149 consultant physicians and 23 A&E consultants) of whom 101 (59%)
replied. Only 45% used the classification, "small, moderate, or
complete" to describe the size of pneumothorax. Just 44% would
do as recommended by the British Thoracic Society and discharge an
asymptomatic patient with a primary pneumothorax and 34% would
discharge a patient with a primary pneumothorax after successful
aspiration. Only 20% were prepared to try aspiration initially for a
secondary pneumothorax with a complete lung collapse. Thirty four per
cent would follow the recommendation to remove a chest drain without
prior clamping of the tube 24 hours after bubbling had stopped. In the
event of a persistent air leak 69% would refer patients or seek a
specialist opinion. Physicians with an interest in respiratory medicine
tolerated persistent air leaks for significantly longer than did
non-respiratory physicians (median of 7 v 5 days, p=0.001). The survey indicates that fewer than expected
consultant physicians and A&E consultants in Wales manage spontaneous
pneumothoraces in the way recommended by the guidelines. Physicians
with an interest in respiratory medicine tended to comply with these
guidelines more than general physicians with interests other than
respiratory medicine or A&E consultants but the trend was not
significant at the 5% level. It is felt that the guidelines should be
disseminated more widely, ensuring that emergency admissions units and
A&E departments have copies on display or easily accessible, and that
they could be expanded to cover other aspects such as timing for surgery.
Keywords: pneumothorax; non-compliance with guidelines
© 2000 by The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Marquette, C-H., Marx, A., Leroy, S., Vaniet, F., Ramon, P., Caussade, S., Smaiti, N., Bonfils, C., the Pneumothorax Study Group,
(2006). Simplified stepwise management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a pilot study.. Eur Respir J
27: 470-476
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
(2005). Poster presentations. Thorax
60: ii53-ii120
[Full Text] -
Packham, S, Jaiswal, P
(2003). Spontaneous pneumothorax: use of aspiration and outcomes of management by respiratory and general physicians. Postgrad. Med. J.
79: 345-347
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Henry, M, Arnold, T, Harvey, J
(2003). BTS guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Thorax
58: ii39-52
[Full Text] -
Mendis, D, El-Shanawany, T, Mathur, A, Redington, A E
(2002). Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: are British Thoracic Society guidelines being followed?. Postgrad. Med. J.
78: 80-84
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
HART, S P
(2001). Management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Postgrad. Med. J.
77: 215-215
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
