Venepuncture: the medicolegal hazards.
Inverclyde Royal NHS Trust, UK.
Venepuncture is commonly regarded as a trivial procedure allocated to the most junior medical staff. The result of this policy is that junior doctors are required to perform a minimally invasive procedure on consenting patients without any structured venepuncture training or assessment. Consequently, inexperienced doctors may perform multiple and sometimes unnecessary, venepunctures, which could damage essential venous access, eg, in the diabetic or renal patient. We review the medicolegal position and suggest that structured venepuncture training is essential and argue that unskilled treatment may be regarded by the Courts as demonstrating the mens rea of assault in the form of recklessness.
Relevant Article
- Legal aspects of venepuncture.
- G. T. Laurie, G. P. Adam
Postgrad. Med. J. 1996 72: 768.[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Mbamalu, D., Banerjee, A.
(1999). Classic techniques in medicine: Methods of obtaining peripheral venous access in difficult situations. Postgrad. Med. J.
75: 459-462
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
